Review this content before approving

Content Type

Accolades

Recipient’s name

Rick Barth and Jill Duerr Berrick

Publication date

October 29, 2025

Author / contact

Name: Rick Barth
Email: rbarth@ssw.umaryland.edu

Image

If this image is very large, please download it, resize it to be smaller, and re-upload it.

Alt text: Rick Barth and Jill Duerr Berrick

Blurb

Rick Barth Published in Families in Society on the Misuse of "Abolition" in Child Welfare Dialogue.

Main content

We are concerned that calls for abolition place the United States as an outlier nation in the global community, continuing to show our national disregard for children and children’s rights. Second, we suggest an end to the use of the term “abolition” to honor the legacy of this word’s profound meaning in the context of U.S. history.

Fundamental to our concern is the continuing failure of those who invoke the term “abolition” to clarify their meaning—is it a fanciful aspiration, or is it a challenge to truly eliminate all child welfare services as we know them? If it is anything other than ending all child welfare services, then it is not abolition—it is reform. Even the staunchest supporters of abolition suggest a repeal-and-replace approach, offering a vague notion about improving community supports for families. If it is a call to end all child welfare services, then it is absurd, as children are routinely harmed and even killed by their parents. For many, their trauma is not interrupted by  their family members, neighbors, or communities; in fact, a substantial proportion of referrals to child welfare services (CWS) come from family members who are unable to offer sufficient protection. The preponderance of authors arguing in favor of child welfare transformation in the special issue suggests that we may be nearing an end to any serious consideration of the abolition of child welfare. Unless “abolitionists” truly mean the complete elimination of all child welfare services, which would create unacceptable peril for children given how prevalent child abuse and neglect is today, the term should be set aside to free “abolition” for resumption of its respected common language use in referring to the abolition of slavery.

Barth, R. P., & Berrick, J. D. A Call to Reject Using “Abolition” in Discussions of Child Welfare Out of Respect for Its Legacy. Families in Society, 0(0), 10443894251369146. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894251369146 

 

 

Approval status

Campus​wide Dent​istry Grad​uate Law Med​icine Nurs​ing Pharm​acy Social Work

Include on the Elm Weekly?

Do not include on the Elm Weekly

Elm Weekly Audience Group

Universitywide

Elm Weekly Subcategory

(Only applies to University Administration)

Unspecified

How many weeks on the Elm Weekly?

1 week

Exclude from Elm Weekly School Editions?

No

Elm Weekly blurb

Optional. Can be used to override the default Elm Weekly blurb.

Elm Weekly image

Optional. Can be used to override the default Elm Weekly image.

Instructions

This listing is accurate as of its most recent publish from the CMS, which occurs automatically every two hours, conditions permitting.

Edit in CMS

  1. Review the content for appropriateness, correctness, and compliance. Keep in mind the University's style guides for writing, as well as our web accessibility requirements. Junk code may have been pasted into the submission unintentionally, so watch out for formatting inconsistencies such as text with an unusual size or font.
  2. Decide whether to approve or reject it for the school or audience group you represent.
  3. Click the "Edit in CMS" button above to directly edit this content in the CMS, then click the "Edit content" icon. This step requires that you have been assigned access to edit this content in the TerminalFour CMS.
  4. Find the "Relevant to ... audiences?" radio buttons for your school or audience group. Select "Approved for publication on the ... homepage" or "Not relevant to ... audiences / Do not publish for ... audiences."
  5. You may make textual revisions or corrections to the content at this time as well. Please note that your edits will apply to all schools or audience groups who have also approved this piece of content. If any groups have already approved this content, you must contact them regarding any edits you wish to make.
  6. Consider also the Elm Weekly email newsletter. If this piece of content falls under your purview, confirm that the "Elm Weekly audience group" field is correct, then use the "Include on the Elm Weekly?" radio button to either approve or reject the content for inclusion on the Elm Weekly.
  7. Select "Update and Approve." Your changes will go live the next time the Elm website is automatically published.